From 6263c7cea5e8340ab6d8d03397e87e920a6bfd72 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Thomas Letan <lthms@soap.coffee>
Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2020 22:02:27 +0100
Subject: Do not extract Coq terms in Strongly-Specified Functions part 2

---
 site/posts/StronglySpecifiedFunctions.v | 10 +++++-----
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

(limited to 'site/posts/StronglySpecifiedFunctions.v')

diff --git a/site/posts/StronglySpecifiedFunctions.v b/site/posts/StronglySpecifiedFunctions.v
index 3adfe50..55af679 100644
--- a/site/posts/StronglySpecifiedFunctions.v
+++ b/site/posts/StronglySpecifiedFunctions.v
@@ -1,9 +1,9 @@
-(** # <h1>Strongly-Specified Functions in Coq, part 1: using the <code>refine</code> Tactic</h1>#
+(** #<h1>Strongly-Specified Functions in Coq, part 1: using the <code>refine</code> Tactic</h1>#
 
-  This is the first article (initially published on #<span class="time">January
-  11, 2015</span>#) of a series of two on how to write strongly-specified
-  functions in Coq. You can read the next part #<a
-  href="/posts/StronglySpecifiedFunctionsProgram">here</a>#. *)
+    This is the first article (initially published on #<span
+    class="time">January 11, 2015</span>#) of a series of two on how to write
+    strongly-specified functions in Coq. You can read the next part #<a
+    href="/posts/StronglySpecifiedFunctionsProgram">here</a>#. *)
 
 (** I started to play with Coq, the interactive theorem prover
     developed by Inria, a few weeks ago. It is a very powerful tool,
-- 
cgit v1.2.3